Red light cameras were
supposed to be a double blessing for Oakland, improving safety and
generating much needed revenue. But when an additional safety measure
sharply reduced violations and corresponding camera ticket income, the
city reversed it.
Now as the City Council this month considers extending the camera program for three more years and possibly expanding it, opponents have seized on the episode to argue that the cameras' alluring profit potential actually make them a threat to traffic safety.
"The city knew they could reduce red light running and instead they decided to increase it to make money," said Jay Beeber a camera opponent and founder of Safer Streets LA.
City officials countered that cameras have decreased collisions, helped collect crime scene evidence and generated more than $1.1 million since they were installed four years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you have a comment regarding the post above, please feel free to leave it here.